#fidesz #szijjártópéter #terrors #ukrainewar

This week, Denmark surfaced a mysterious object found near the exploded Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from the Baltic Sea. It turned out to be a buoy used for marine smoke signals. After the explosion, Sweden, Denmark and Germany launched an investigation, but to this day it has not been possible to clarify who could have been behind the explosions. We have collected the assumptions so far that tried to explain who could have carried out the attack on Nord Stream 1 and 2.
After the mysterious explosions last September, which sent serious geopolitical waves, everyone immediately believed that the Russians were involved. On the one hand, they saw it as another chapter of the Russian hybrid war and the deepening European-Russian energy war. However, as time passed, and almost half a year has passed, the investigations so far have not brought to the surface irrefutable evidence. Four countries came under suspicion as possible instigators, since everyone agreed that such a large-scale operation could only be carried out with state support a hundred meters below sea level.

And the four states were Russia, the United States, Ukraine and the United Kingdom. Soon after the explosions, it became clear that sabotage had taken place. The investigation by the Swedish Attorney General's Office was completed in November, and the report also clarified that explosive remains and other foreign objects were found at the bottom of the sea at the site of the explosion in the Baltic Sea, not far from the Danish island of Bornholm.

1. The Russians did it
One day after the explosion on September 26, the Ukrainians made it clear that only the Russians could have done it. Previously, the Russian oil industry giant Gazprom announced that it would temporarily stop gas delivery on Nord Stream 1 due to maintenance, after which the delivery was permanently stopped. The Nord Stream 2 bar was completed, but never operated. This was the period when President Putin threatened that Europe would freeze in winter if planned energy sanctions against Russia were carried out.

But the question arises:

WHY SHOULD THE GAS PIPELINE BE EXPLODED WHEN RUSSIAN BLACKMAIL WAS WORKING UNTIL SEPTEMBER WITH THE REDUCED QUANTITY OF GAS SUPPLIES, AND IF THEY WANT TO USE THE TWO SYSTEMS TOWARDS EUROPE IN THE FUTURE, WHY DESTROY IT COMPLETELY?

According to Simone Tagliapietra, a Belgian energy expert, there may have been disagreements within the Kremlin. Many people were scared when Putin announced the cessation of gas deliveries, since it was a serious source of income for the Russian economy. It is not out of the question that a group of hard-line leaders decided to blow up the wire and thus end the debate.

Dmitry Peskov, the spokesman for the Kremlin, stated shortly after the action: "it is very difficult to imagine that a terrorist act of this magnitude could have been carried out without the participation of some state."

2. The British did it
After the explosion, the official Russian rhetoric was that Ukraine and its Western allies could be behind the action. The spokesman of the Kremlin, Dmitry Peskov, said why we would have done it, with the explosion we lost the gas delivery route to Europe. A month later, the Russian Ministry of Defense came forward with an allegation. According to this, members of the British Navy participated in the planning, preparation and implementation of the operation. No evidence was provided.

They were the same British experts who helped the Ukrainians coordinate the drone attack in Simferopol, Crimea, the Russian Defense Ministry claimed. London called the allegations fabricated by the British Ministry of Defense, which, according to the British Ministry of Defense, the Russians threw into the public's mind in order to divert attention from the heavy battlefield defeats suffered as a result of the Ukrainian counteroffensive in the fall.

3. The Americans did it
In February, when the Swedish-Danish-German investigation into the bombings was still ongoing, an article by the renowned Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh was published, which claimed no less than that the action was carried out by the Americans, and that Biden himself had given the final permission. given by the president. Referring to an informant with knowledge of the background of the case, Hersh wrote that US Navy divers placed explosive devices under the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline last June under the cover of the Baltops military exercise.